The Sound Shark Swims Through the CES Show – Part 2

By Paul Terpstra | January 18, 2016

In my last post I discussed some general impressions of the 2016 CES (Consumer Electronics Show) and I promised more about the many, many drones that were on display. Obviously drones are becoming a bigger and bigger part of video production and any videographer or production house needs to at least be aware of what drones can and cannot do for them. Unfortunately, we are going to have to make some major breakthroughs in the area of noise cancellation before any of these drones will be able to gather audio with one of our parabolic microphones. But it’s still fun looking!

This was the most interesting and by far the most expensive “drone” at the show. It is the Ehang 184 “drone” that was on display. It is intended to carry a passenger or a package to a pre-programmed location. Because the passenger is merely a passenger and not “operating” the machine, it can evidently be classified as a “drone” instead of a helicopter.

I’m not sure I’m quite ready to strap myself in one of these things. Click here for more info.

This photo shows the least expensive version, I saw, of what would normally be considered a drone (quadcopter). It will not be available for a few months but its selling price is only $500. For that price you only get 720 video but it’s an interesting option. It includes a watch band type of device that lets the drone follow you or orbit around you. That’s pretty impressive for the price.

If you look closely you will see that the drone has a its own cage that supposedly keeps it from running into, and damaging objects (including humans). The cage is also designed to upright the drone if it should crash so that it can take off again with the application of power.

I am still not quite sure if this paper airplane would be considered to be a “drone” by many peopleI am still not quite sure if this paper airplane would be considered to be a “drone” by many people, but it can provide remote video from an airborne craft, so I think it qualifies. So I think it qualifies. This product would then take over as the least expensive “drone” that I saw at CES at a price of just $200.So

While it cannot hover like a quadcopter, it can provide remote airborne video controlled by your smartphone. It may be worth checking it out.

I can’t help but mention the new drone Yuneec will be releasing soon. It was developed in cooperation with Intel (which acquired a stake in Yuneec) and incorporates both thermal and ultrasonic sensors to avoid collisions. The drone would actually move away from the operator as he walked toward it. When instructed to fly into a post, the drone simply diverted around the post and continued on its path.

The projected price is $2000, but it was a very impressive technology. Below are the photos I took to show the wide variety of drones, and I’m sure I missed some smaller manufacturers that didn’t make it into the big hall.

Below are the photos I took to show the wide variety of drones, and I’m sure I missed some smaller manufacturers that didn’t make itto look at each drone, but you can see how prolific and diverse theyBelow are the photos I took to show the wide variety of drones, and I’m sure I missed some smaller manufacturers that didn’t make it to look at each drone, but you can see how prolific and diverse they are in the big hall. into the big hall. I did not stop to look at each drone, but you can see how prolific and diverse theywatchband-typeFor that price, you only get 720 video, but it’s an interesting option.If you look closely, you will see that the drone has its own cage that supposedly keeps it from running into and damaging objects (including humans).,In my last post, I discussed some general impressions of the 2016 CES (Consumer Electronics Show), and I promised more about the many, many drones that were on display.Obviously, drones are becoming a bigger and bigger part of video production, and any videographer or production house needs to at least be aware of what drones can and cannot do for them.will need to make major breakthroughs in noise cancellation before any of these drones can capture have become. Is it just me, or do some of these drones look like they were designed by George Lucas?

No. I didn’t see any of these at CES… but if you run out of useful things to do with your drone, you could always race it! (Click on the image to see a very wild video about drone racing. Click here for a second video.)

← Previous Post
The Sound Shark Swims Through the CES Show – Part 1
→ Next Post
Sound Shark makes the gift list…

Can Your Mic Reach As Far Your Lens?

"Sad Sam the Cameraman" mascot for KLOVER MiK parabolic microphones.
a "Made in the USA" logoa "Made in Wisconsin" logo